Like father like son

Tom Dodd and Chris Dodd - like father like son

Can’t Buy Me Laws: Congress Must Give Back Chris Dodd’s Dirty Money

Former U.S. Sen. Chris Dodd, now the head of the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), has been pushing the passage of Web-censorship bills in both the House and Senate. When Congress shelved the bills last week amid an unprecedented wave of public opposition, Dodd told Fox News:

“Those who count on ‘Hollywood’ for support need to understand that this industry is watching very carefully who’s going to stand up for them when their job is at stake. Don’t ask me to write a check for you when you think your job is at risk and then don’t pay any attention to me when my job is at stake.”

It’s unusual for a lobbyist to directly admit on TV that he buys Congressional votes. Chris must be drinking heavily. Or he’s already drunk enough for a lifetime. Hung around the political watering holes so long that he no longer knows right from wrong. Thinks selling out his constitutents was just another retail business, like any other. A family business. Following in the footsteps of his dad, Tom… censured by the Senate in 1967 for spending campaign contributions, directly converting them to bribes. The excuse was ‘the poor guy’ just drank too much, Tom Dodd took money from Central American and African dictators. Now ‘poor Chris’ has just gone over to the other side of the ledger and become the buyer. Hey, somebody’s got to do it… right?


The real mystery here is why the voters in Connecticut, my home state, even considered electing the son of a known grifter and grafter to office in 1980… why not go with someone who might not sell them out? And then why they did elect him again and again and again – 1986, 1992, 1998, and 2004 – knowing all the while that he was taking money and delivering the goods for interests other than their own.

And now he’s working the otherside of the revolving door. Sometimes you have have to wonder if we don’t deserve just exactly what we’ve got.

Chris Dodd was the point man in the Senate for Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act the repeal of Glass-Steagal. After all, we voted all these criminals into office, not once, but again and again and again… generation after generation. They say Gramm–Leach–Bliley wouldn’t have passed without him.

About jfl

A 66 year-old American male living in Chiangrai, Thailand
This entry was posted in Politics, US politics. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Like father like son

  1. charlie says:

    Your home state also elected, more than once, old Lieberman. Also known as the senator from Tel Aviv. Electing Dodd was not much of a stretch after electing Joe.
    I don’t mean to “rub it in” with this comment, just tossing in my 2 cents worth on the election/elect-ability of the clowns we have here in the US of A.

    • jfl says:

      You’re right, of course, on Lieberman Charlie. I guess I just dismissed him as so obvious as not to need mention. I think that many more people are aware of Lieberman and his stand… I assume that the people who voted for Lieberman did so with their eyes wide open… that they support Israeli ‘interests’ more than they do those of the United States.

      But Chris Dodd is the quintessential insider, and so was his father. They are representative of the ‘average’ senator. Look at his picture. Waspish, upstanding, business-type… rotten to the core.

      I don’t know what to say about the number of people dedicated to Israel and that country’s serial war-crimes against the Palestinians… they have the numbers to elect Lieberman. And both the Republicrat candidates and the Demoblican incumbent absolutely shamelessly campaign on Israel first policies… policies which aren’t even in Israel’s favor.

    • jfl says:

      Just reviewed the wikipedia recount of Joe’s re-election in 2006, Charlie. Illustrates very well the co-operation between Republicrat and Demoblican parties when their common interests are threatened… they have no trouble at all co-operating to crush any chance of the people picking an alternative to their candidates, even to the extent of running/condoning a ‘third-party’ candidacy themselves.

Comments are closed.