The United States/Israel Axis is operating as a gluttonous, rogue aggressor.

US sends drones over Syria as fighting spreads

http://robinlea.com/pub/images/bloodthirsty_hun_cartoon.jpg

The United States/Israel Axis is operating as a gluttonous, rogue aggressor

US military officials confirmed Saturday that US drones are flying over Syria, as fighting spreads inside the country and US officials discuss military or “humanitarian” intervention to topple Syrian President Bashar al Assad.

The drone flights, which flagrantly violate Syrian air space, include a “good number” of both military and US intelligence drones, according to US defense officials. These officials said the drones’ mission is to obtain “intercepts of Syrian government and military communications in an effort to ‘make the case for a widespread international response.’”

The Israeli daily Ha’aretz also reported Saturday that Syrian forces had captured 40 Turkish intelligence operatives working with the “opposition” inside Syria. It said the Turkish operatives confessed to working with the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad to train the US-backed Free Syrian Army (FSA), and claimed that Mossad operatives were working with Al Qaeda operatives in Jordan planning operations in Syria.

As in last year’s war in Libya, Washington is seizing on violence between the Assad regime and US-backed opposition forces—which are organizing protests and killings inside Syria—to justify military intervention.

Even reports by the US-backed Syrian “opposition” and in the US media suggest that the Free Syrian Army and similar forces have little support outside of a few cities such as Deraa, Homs, and Hama. Aided and supplied by Turkey, European powers, and the United States, they are instead using terrorist actions to undermine the Assad regime and facilitate foreign military intervention.

The United States/Israel Axis has broken all bonds linked to the rule of law and is operating as a gluttonous, rogue aggressor. The United States has become a rogue, criminal aggressor nation prosecuting a half-dozen aggressions simultaneously and looking for more… under its Nobel Peace Prize Laureate president. The US truly has become the Great Satan the Ayatollah Khomeini used to characterize it as.

Posted in IL, Politics, US politics | Leave a comment

Actions speak louder than words…

To whom did the Norwegian Nobel Peace Prize Committee think they were speaking? To whom does the Nobel Peace Prize Laureate think he is speaking? To themselves.

Can they possibly believe their own phony propaganda? Did he laugh at his own ‘clever’ joke? A spiritually dead man talking.

Posted in Politics, US politics | Leave a comment

The soul of our nation is dead

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2012/02/13/world/SUB-MILITARY/SUB-MILITARY-popup.jpg

Dark Passenger, Admiral William H. McRaven leads the Special Operations Command

The United States and its Dark Passenger

From the “granular level” of Anbar Province circa 2005, the so-called Salvadoran option advocated by Vice President Joe Biden and others is fast becoming national military doctrine. Admiral McRaven wants to base hunter-killer “cells” in Asia, Africa and Latin America. While the traditional big unit military is being squeezed, special ops budgets are rising. The nation is in the midst of a major shift.

As with any new tool or weapon, people tend to find uses for it. All that’s required in this instance is the establishment of an “enemy” – someone demonized or inconvenient to the point of warranting assassination. The challenge is to keep the action secret and anonymous – like the virtually certain recent Israeli murders of five Iranian scientists.

The United States government and its lethal military operate vis-à-vis its citizens in two distinct modes: Public Relations or Secrecy. Trust us, it says. We have your best interests at heart. And, besides, opposition is futile. So enjoy your bread & circus and don’t ask any questions.

In the US the SOC. In Thailand the ISOC. I don’t know what it’s called in Israel. The US/Israeli Axis is commanded by dead men walking, so revolted by themselves that they seek to kill others in ‘retribution’ for their own heinous crimes. They are marching us all toward WW III to pay for those crimes. The guilty can never, ever forgive their innocent victims.

Posted in IL, Politics, US politics | 2 Comments

So… who ya gonna believe?

http://www.juancole.com/images/2011/12/usbasesme.jpg

The stars in the red countries are US miltary bases. Who's attacking whom?

Thailand Charges Iranian Suspects Over Blast

Reacting to the latest developments, Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, accused Iran of targeting diplomats, saying that if the world did not stop Iran’s “aggression”, the attacks would spread.

“It harms innocent diplomats in many countries and the nations of the world must condemn Iran’s terror actions and demarcate red lines against Iranian aggression,” he said.

“If such aggression is not stopped it will spread to many countries.”

Iran has denied any involvement in the blasts, saying Israel often made such accusations.

Iranian state TV quoted Ramin Mehmanparast, the country’s foreign ministry spokesman, as saying that Israel was behind the explosions.

“The main goal of the Zionist regime is to conceal its real essence in carrying out terrorist acts particularly assassinating Iran’s scientists,” the state news agency IRNA quoted Mehmanparast as saying.

“We are not accepting, we are denying this and I don’t know how they (the Israelis) can assume within a short time of one hour that to say who has done this,” Iran’s ambassador to India, Seyed Mehdi Nabizadeh, said, referring to the New Delhi attack.

“It has happened in India. If India’s security says something like that, then we have to verify.”

So who ya gonna believe? The guys (US/Israel) who’ve been terrorizing the Middle East non-stop for decades? Or the guys (Iran) who haven’t attacked anyone for a couple of centuries?

American Decline in Perspective

[T]he primary threat to the U.S. and Israel is that Iran might deter their free exercise of violence. A further threat is that the Iranians clearly seek to extend their influence to neighboring Iraq and Afghanistan, and beyond as well. Those “illegitimate” acts are called “destabilizing” (or worse). In contrast, forceful imposition of U.S. influence halfway around the world contributes to “stability” and order, in accord with traditional doctrine about who owns the world.

Posted in IL, Politics, TH politics, US politics | Leave a comment

Rewriting the Thai Constitution

Cabinet approves charter change draft

http://robinlea.com/pub/images/ThaiConstitution.png

The Thai Constitution - a gift of HM King Prajadipok

The cabinet on Monday approved the government’s charter amendment draft which seeks to amend Section 291 of the 2007 constitution to make way for the establishment of a 99-member constitution drafting assembly (CDA)… of the 99 CDA members 77 would be elected by the people from the existing provinces and 22 academics and experts in various fields elected by parliament… The government’s draft would be in addition to other drafts filed by the people’s sector and the Pheu Thai Party.

Ms Yingluck said the government would seek to amend only Section 291 to have a CDA set up. It is the CDA that would consider how to amend the rest of the constitution and the government would not get involved in the amendment process.

CHAPTER XV Amendment of the Constitution

Section 291. An amendment of the Constitution may be made under the rules and procedures as follows:

  1. a motion for amendment must be proposed by the Council of Ministers, members of the House of Representatives of not less than one-fifth of the total number of the existing members of the House of Representatives or members of both Houses of not less than one-fifth of the total number of the existing members thereof or persons having the right to vote of not less than fifty thousand in number under the law on lodging a petition for introducing the law; A motion for amendment which has the effect of changing the democratic regime of government with the King as Head of the State or changing the form of the State shall be prohibited;
  2. a motion for amendment must be proposed in the form of a draft Constitution Amendment and the National Assembly shall consider it in three readings;
  3. the voting in the first reading for acceptance in principle shall be by roll call and open voting, and the amendment must be approved by votes of not less than one-half of the total number of the existing members of both Houses;
  4. the consideration in the second reading section by section shall also be subject to a public hearing participated by persons having the right to vote, who have proposed the draft Constitution Amendment; The voting in the second reading for consideration section by section shall be decided by a simple majority of votes
  5. at the conclusion of the second reading, there shall be an interval of fifteen days after which the National Assembly shall proceed with its third reading;
  6. the voting in the third and final reading shall be by roll call and open voting, and its promulgation as the Constitution must be approved by votes of more than one-half of the total number of the existing members of both Houses;
  7. after the resolution has been passed in accordance with the rules and procedures hitherto specified, the draft Constitution Amendment shall be presented to the King, and the provisions of section 150 and section 151 shall apply mutatis mutandis.

Outline of Nitirat’s constitution draft

Posted in Politics, TH politics | Leave a comment

An open letter from Chiranuch Premchaiporn

updated: 19 February, 2012

Some facts everyone should know about Thai courts and prisons

Court sets date to decide webmaster Chiranuch’s fate

Court officials yesterday said the court has been fair in allowing as many hearings, in-depth testimonies, and cross-examinations as possible.

All sides should also trust the integrity and knowledge of the court in the coming verdict, they said.

No one trusts the integrity of the Thai kourts. It certainly seems like the decision to crucify Chiranuch has already been made and Thais are being ‘cautioned’ to accept it.

Convicting Chiranuch is unacceptable. We need to plan what to do in response.

Chiranuch’s case seems more ‘outrageous’ to us because each of us can easily imagine ourselves in Chiranuch’s shoes… but everyone of those railroaded for the political crime of ‘lese mejeste’ is guilty only of ‘speaking their mind’. Of exercising free speech.

Sooner or later we will have to stand up and do what it takes to force the oppressors to stand down. If Chiranuch’s case does that – we will all have to thank Chiranuch for forcing us to do what we all know has to be done.

updated: 18 February, 2012

All of FACThai’s coverage of Chiranuch’s trial

http://facthai.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/2860288.jpg

Chiranuch Premchaiporn

Dear friends/colleagues and those who always interested on my trial,

Three years, are the time I have to live my life being accused of committing a crime under Section 14 and 15 of the Computer Crime Act. Still, I have to continue a life like this without knowing an end. For all these time, I would like to thank you for your assistance, support and keen interest on the trial observation always.

The police arrested me at Prachatai Office on 6 March 2009 while the prosecutor filed the case to the Criminal Court on 31 March 2010. On the latter date, I was detained in the court basement for four hours before THB 300,000 bail was guaranteed by my sister’s career (she is a nurse in the government hospital) as an exchange for my contemporary release.

The court then arranged a meeting on 31 May 2010 to investigate the witnesses, collect the evidence as well as decide on the hearing dates. At first, the hearings were scheduled for eight consecutive days in February 2011 but could only continue for four days with five prosecutor witnesses’ presence.

The rest of the witnesses said they were not available on the mentioned dates required the judges, prosecutors, and the lawyers’ team to set up a new hearing schedule from September to October 2011. Due to a large time gap; the composition of the judges in the second period were changed with regards to the annual shift occurred in the bureaucratic system.

In September, the hearings of the prosecutors’ witnesses were completed and the hearings of the Defense witnesses had started including that of myself.

In October, massive flooding in Bangkok prevented the continual court trial, Mr. Danny O’Brien from Committee to Protect Journalists who was traveling all the way from San Francisco being the only witness allowed. At the hearing, an interpreter provided by the court was unable to give an accurate interpretation. The lawyers’ team; as a result, was decided to submit the testimony written by Mr. O’Brien beforehand and would like to postponed the rest of the hearings to 14-16 February, 2012.

One week left, when the hearing of the Defense witnesses should come to the final round. This time, the court trial will continue from 14-16 February 2012 at Court Room 910, the Criminal Court on Ratchadapisek Road with five respectful witnesses:

Professor Sawatree Suksri from Department of Criminal Law, Thammasat University: an expert on Computer Crime Law.

Professor Jittat Fakcharoenphol, Ph.D, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, Kasetsart University: an expert on IT Technology

Doctor Kitibhoom Chutasmith, Director of Bhusing Hospital, Sri Sakhet Province: Prachatai Webboard user

Mr. Wanchat Bhadungrat, Founder of Pantip.com

Assistant Professor Pirongrong Ramasoota Rananan, Associate Dean, Department of Graduate Studies, Faculty of Communication Arts, Chulalongkorn University: a scholar in Mass Media who researched on the Internet Content Regulations

At the moment, the hearings are expected to proceed with the witnesses shown on the below list:

14 February 2012 (All Day): Professor Sawatree, Professor Jittat and Doctor Kitibhoom

15 February 2012 (Morning session): Mr. Wanchat Bhadungrat

16 February 2012 (Afternoon Session): Assistant Professor Pirongrong

For those interested to attend the trial observation, the court usually runs the morning session from 09.00-12.00 and the afternoon session from 13.00-16.00. Interpretation service is also available for international observers Please feel free to contact Ms. Kheetanat Wannaboworn KWannaboworn@gmail.com or 084-899-0509 to inform of your requirement.

Besides my court trial, Somyot Pruksakasemsuk, Founding Editor of “Voice of Thaksin” will also undergo his trial on 13 February 2012, SongKla Province.

Somyot has been charged under Article 112 of the Criminal Code as the Publisher and Advertising Editor of the mentioned magazine for the presence of an article written by “Jit Phollachan” (alias) while the article was claimed to contain defamatory contents to the King and the Royal Family.

Each month, Somyot needs to travel to different provinces around Thailand depending on the witnesses’ House Registration (even though all of them are working in Bangkok); so far, Somyot’s trials were held in SaKaew, Petchaboon, and Nakhon Sawan with different judges every time.

Somyot used to apply for bail for seven times and all of them had been rejected. For this reason, his son, Mr. Panitan Pruksakasemsuk who is currently a sophomore at Faculty of Law, Thammasat University decided to call for his father’s Rights to Bail on Hunger Strike called “Free my dad”. The strike will begin at 4pm, 11 February 2012 and will continue for 112 hours.

I really hope to receive your attendance again at the trial observation and hope to have your support as well on Somyot’s Rights to Bail.

With Respect,

Chiranuch Premchaiporn

Posted in Politics, TH politics | Leave a comment

Hey, hey, Obama-fay : How many kids dja kill today?

http://robinlea.com/pub/images/obama_patton.jpg

Hey, hey, Obama-fay, how many kids dja kill today?

NATO airstrike kills eight children in Afghanistan

A NATO airstrike killed eight children in Afghanistan’s Kapisa province northeast of the capital Kabul, President Hamid Karzai said on Thursday.

The children were aged between about seven and 15, he said, while the adult was a mentally-handicapped 20-year-old.

The Nobel Peace Prize Laureate cuts eight more notches in his belt.

During the Nuremberg trials, the chief American prosecutor, Robert H. Jackson, stated:

To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.

Posted in Politics, US politics | 2 Comments

Barack Obama and Howard Dean ♥ the MEK and ♥ Israeli terrorism, too

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/120207-tehran-bombing-hmed-3p.photoblog600.jpg

A car that was bombed by two assailants on a motorcycle in Tehran on Jan. 11, killing Iranian nuclear scientist Mostafa Ahamdi Roshan

Israel Teams With Terror Group to Kill Iran’s Nuclear Scientists, U.S. officials tell NBC News

February 09, 2012

Deadly attacks on Iranian nuclear scientists are being carried out by an Iranian dissident group that is financed, trained and armed by Israel’s secret service, U.S. officials tell NBC News, confirming charges leveled by Iran’s leaders.

The group, the People’s Mujahedin of Iran, has long been designated as a terrorist group by the United States, accused of killing American servicemen and contractors in the 1970s and supporting the takeover of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran before breaking with the Iranian mullahs in 1980.

The attacks, which have killed five Iranian nuclear scientists since 2007 and may have destroyed a missile research and development site, have been carried out in dramatic fashion, with motorcycle-borne assailants often attaching small magnetic bombs to the exterior of the victims’ cars.

U.S. officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the Obama administration is aware of the assassination campaign but has no direct involvement.

In the most recent attack, on Jan. 11, 2012, Mostafa Ahamdi Roshan died in a blast in Tehran moments after two assailants on a motorcycle placed a small magnetic bomb on his vehicle. Roshan was a deputy director at the Natanz uranium enrichment facility and was reportedly involved in procurement for the nuclear program, which Iran insists is not a weapons program.

Previous attacks include the assassination of Massoud Ali-Mohammadi, killed by a bomb outside his Tehran home in January 2010, and an explosion in November of that year that took the life of Majid Shahriari and wounded Fereydoun Abbasi-Davani, who is now the head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization.

For the United States, the alleged role of the MEK is particularly troublesome. In 1997, the State Department designated it a terrorist group, justifying it with an unclassified 40-page summary of the organization’s activities going back more than 25 years. The paper, sent to Congress in 1998, was written by Wendy Sherman, now undersecretary of state for political affairs and then an aide to Secretary of State Madeleine Albright.

The report, which was obtained by NBC News, was unsparing in its assessment. “The Mujahedin (MEK) collaborated with Ayatollah Khomeini to overthrow the former shah of Iran,” it said. “As part of that struggle, they assassinated at least six American citizens, supported the takeover of the U.S. embassy, and opposed the release of the American hostages.” In each case, the paper noted, “Bombs were the Mujahedin’s weapon of choice, which they frequently employed against American targets.”

A group of former Cabinet-level officials have joined together to support the MEK’s removal from the official U.S. Foreign Terrorist Organization list, even taking out a full-page ad last year in the New York Times calling for the removal of the MEK from the U.S. terrorist list. Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, former U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey, former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton; former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge, former FBI Director Louis Freeh and former Rep. Patrick Kennedy were among those whose signatures were on the ad.

“There’s an extraordinary group of bipartisan or even apolitical leaders, military leaders, diplomats, the United States … the United Kingdom, the European Union, even a U.S. District Court in Washington, said that this group that was put on the foreign terrorist organization watch list in 1997 doesn’t deserve to be there,” Ridge said in November on “The Andrea Mitchell Show” on MSNBC TV.

U.S. politicians also have been pushing the U.S. government to protect the 3,400 MEK members and their families at Camp Ashraf in Iraq, about 35 miles north of Baghdad. With the departure of U.S. troops, the MEK feared that Iraqi forces, with encouragement from Iran, would attack the camp, leading to a bloodbath. At the last minute, however, agreement was brokered with the United Nations that would permit the MEK members’ departure for resettlement in unspecified democratic countries. As of this week, there’s been little movement on the planned resettlement.

The Iranians see what’s happening as terrorism and hypocrisy by the United States. They have forwarded documents and other evidence to the United Nations – and directly to the United States, they say.

If the MEK had the Israelis in their crosshairs whole families would be being assassinated rather than having Howard Dean work to get them OFF of Washington’s terrorist list.

The MEK have assassinated at least 6 American citizens… but Barack Obama has probably assassinated 6 AmCits himself by now. The Israelis killed 34 on the USS Liberty alone. So, no problem from that angle.

The Iranians see the United States as hypocritical? The entire world sees the United States as hypocrtical. No one pays any attention to anything the United States says anymore. It’s assumed that, “If the US’ lips are moving, they’re lying.” A good assumption. You’d have to be a fool to assume otherwise.

Posted in IL, Politics, US politics | Leave a comment

70% ♥ Guantanamo, 83% ♥ drone assassinations, 79% ♥ drone assassinations of Americans

http://www.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_606w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2012/01/27/National-Politics/Images/137797503.jpg

70% ♥ Guantanamo, 83% ♥ drone assassinations, 70% ♥ drone assassinations of Americans

Washington Post/ABC poll – 4 February 2012

13. Changing topics, thinking about the following decisions of the Obama administration, please tell me whether you strongly approve, somewhat approve, somewhat disapprove, or strongly disapprove.

  • a. Keeping open the prison at Guantanamo Bay for terrorist suspects
  • b. The drawdown of U.S. troops from Afghanistan
  • c. The use of unmanned, “drone” aircraft against terrorist suspects overseas

14. (If approve of drone aircraft) What if those suspected terrorists are American citizens living in other countries? In that case do you approve or disapprove of the use of drones?

  approve disapprove no opinion
no. total strongly somewhat total strongly somewhat
13a 70 42 28 24 12 13 5
13b 78 56 23 19 10 9 2
13c 83 59 23 11 7 4 6
14 79 17 4

Ok. The Washington Post/ABC poll stuck in the ‘somewhat’ category to muddy the waters. Still… have you ever seen a more brutal collection of smiling young drones in your life?

Posted in Politics, US politics | Leave a comment

All Hail the Assassin in Chief!

http://robinlea.com/pub/images/CivilianCasualitiesInAfghanistan.jpg

CIA's drone campaign in Pakistan has killed dozens of civilians who had gone to help rescue victims or were attending funerals

Obama terror drones: CIA tactics in Pakistan include targeting rescuers and funerals

The CIA’s drone campaign in Pakistan has killed dozens of civilians who had gone to help rescue victims or were attending funerals, an investigation by the Bureau for the Sunday Times has revealed.

The findings are published just days after President Obama claimed that the drone campaign in Pakistan was a ‘targeted, focused effort’ that ‘has not caused a huge number of civilian casualties.’

But research by the Bureau has found that since Obama took office three years ago, between 282 and 535 civilians have been credibly reported as killed including more than 60 children. A three month investigation including eye witness reports has found evidence that at least 50 civilians were killed in follow-up strikes when they had gone to help victims. More than 20 civilians have also been attacked in deliberate strikes on funerals and mourners. The tactics have been condemned by leading legal experts.

Although the drone attacks were started under the Bush administration in 2004, they have been stepped up enormously under Obama.

One hundred thirteen years ago on 4 February, the United States attacked the government of the Philippines which had accepted its pledge of help in winning its independence from Spain…

The Greatest Victory Ever Achieved by the Soldiers of the United States, Part 1

It was found that the Moros numbered six hundred, counting women and children; that their crater bowl was in the summit of a peak or mountain twenty-two hundred feet above sea level, and very difficult of access for Christian troops and artillery. Then General Wood ordered a surprise, and went along himself to see the order carried out. Our troops climbed the heights by devious and difficult trails, and even took some artillery with them. The kind of artillery is not specified, but in one place it was hoisted up a sharp acclivity by tackle a distance of some three hundred feet. Arrived at the rim of the crater, the battle began. Our soldiers numbered five hundred and forty. They were assisted by auxiliaries consisting of a detachment of native constabulary in our pay – their numbers not given – and by a naval detachment, whose numbers are not stated. But apparently the contending parties were about equal as to number – six hundred men on our side, on the edge of the bowl; six hundred men, women and children in the bottom of the bowl. Depth of the bowl, fifty feet.

General Wood’s order was “Kill or capture the six hundred.”

The battle began – it is officially called by that name – our forces firing down into the crater with their artillery and their deadly small arms of precision; the savages furiously returning the fire, probably with brickbats – though this is merely a surmise of mine, as the weapons used by the savages are not nominated in the cablegram. Heretofore the Moros have used knives and clubs mainly; also ineffectual trade-muskets when they had any.

The official report stated that the battle was fought with prodigious energy on both sides during a day and a half, and that it ended with a complete victory for the American arms. The completeness of the victory is established by this fact: that of the six hundred Moros not one was left alive.

The Greatest Victory Ever Achieved by the Soldiers of the United States, Part 2

The ominous paralysis continues. There has been a slight sprinkle – an exceedingly slight sprinkle – in the correspondence columns, of angry rebukes of the President for calling this cowardly massacre a “brilliant feat of arms,” and for praising our butchers for “holding up the honor of the flag” in that singular way; but there is hardly a ghost of a whisper about the feat of arms in the editorial columns of the papers.

The savages were all massacred. The plain intention was to massacre them all and leave none alive. Then where was the use in furnishing mere temporary relief to a person who was presently to be exterminated? The dispatches call this battue a “battle.” In what way was it a battle? It has no resemblance to a battle. In a battle there are always as many as five wounded men to one killed outright. When this so-called battle was over, there were certainly not fewer than two hundred wounded savages lying on the field. What became of them? Since not one savage was left alive!

The inference seems plain. We cleaned up our four days’ work and made it complete by butchering those helpless people.

http://robinlea.com/pub/images/ImperialistsInChief.jpg

All Hail the Imperialist Assassins in Chief

American Anti-Imperialist League

The American Anti-Imperialist League was an organization established in the United States on June 15, 1898, to battle the American annexation of the Philippines as an insular area. The anti-imperialists opposed the expansion because they believed imperialism violated the credo of republicanism, especially the need for “consent of the governed”… The Anti-Imperialist League represented an older generation and were rooted in an earlier era; they were defeated in terms of public opinion, the 1900 election, and the actions of Congress and the President because most of the younger ‘Progressives’ who were just coming to power supported imperialism.

Posted in Politics, US politics | Leave a comment